Drug-induced lupus erythematosus
What is drug-induced lupus erythematosus?
Drug-induced lupus erythematosus is an uncommon, mild to moderately severe, lupus-like syndrome related in time to continuous exposure to a specific medication and which resolves after the trigger drug is ceased. As in idiopathic or usual-type lupus erythematosus (LE), there are three categories recognised:
- Drug-induced systemic LE (SLE)
- Drug-induced subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE)
- Drug-induced chronic cutaneous LE (CLE).
This excludes medication-induced flares of pre-existing or latent LE.
Who gets drug-induced lupus erythematosus?
Drug-induced LE differs from idiopathic LE:
- Drug-induced LE affects older people: average age is about double that of idiopathic LE, which mainly affects the childbearing age group, reflecting increased medication use
- Drug-induced LE does not show the strong female predominance (90% female in idiopathic LE)
- Drug-induced LE affects white rather than black-skin (idiopathic LE is more common in black skin).
There is a time relationship with the causative drug: the symptoms must have begun after starting treatment with a drug. But the latent period (lag or incubation time) between starting the medication and the first symptoms ranges from 1 month to more than 10 years. This can make it difficult to identify the trigger drug.
It has been estimated that 10% of cases of SLE are drug-induced and, in one case series, 20% of biopsy-proven cases of subacute cutaneous LE were drug-induced.
There are some predisposing genetic factors identified including:
- Slow acetylator status (in which breakdown of medication by the liver is slower than usual)
- Certain tissue types: HLA DR4, DR2, DR3, DR0301, DQB1, B8, 1 (tissue types are rather like blood types)
- Complement C4 null allele (an abnormality of a protein required for blood clotting)
Medications associated with drug-induced lupus erythematosus
The drugs associated with drug-induced LE can be classified into 4 groups:
- Definite association
- Probable association
- Possible association
- Recently reported.
Another way to classify them is as high, medium, low or very low risk.
Drug-induced SLE
See table below for the most commonly reported causes.
| Medications reported with a definite association to drug-induced SLE | |
|---|---|
| Procainamide | 15–20%, 30–90% become ANA positive, onset 3 months to 2 years after starting the medication: high risk but rarely prescribed now |
| Hydralazine | 5–8%; for slow acetylators and HLA-DR4 then 10% risk; high risk but rarely prescribed now |
| Quinidine | Moderate risk (<1%) |
| Isoniazid | Low risk |
| Minocycline | Relates to prolonged course and cumulative dose; low risk |
| Methyldopa | Low risk |
| Chlorpromazine | Low risk |
Drug-induced subacute cutaneous LE
The most frequently reported trigger drugs for drug-induced subacute cutaneous LE include:
- medications to treat high blood pressure especially calcium channel blockers; low to very low risk
- antifungals especially terbinafine (probable association)
Drug-induced chronic cutaneous LE
Medications reported to cause drug-induced chronic cutaneous LE include:
- fluorouracil derivatives (probable association)
- non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (possible association)
- tumour necrosis factor antagonists: infliximab, etanercept – recent reports; very low risk
- voriconazole, an oral antifungal agent
Clinical features of drug-induced lupus erythematosus
Drug-induced SLE
Drug-induced SLE begins with a gradual onset of generally mild lupus-like symptoms:
- Arthralgia/arthritis (joint pain) is very characteristic, present in 90% and often the only clinical feature.
- Myalgia (muscle pain) is typical and affects 50%
- Fever
- Serositis: pleurisy, pericarditis
Lupus-specific skin changes are rare in drug-induced SLE, but the following may infrequently occur in mild forms:
- Sun sensitivity (photosensitivity)
- Purpura
- Erythema nodosum
- Vasculitis: urticarial vascultis or necrotising hypersensitivity vasculitis
Photosensitivity |
Urticarial vasculitis |
Hypersensitivity vasculitis |
Common features of idiopathic SLE that are rare or absent from drug-induced SLE include:
- Skin: ‘butterfly’ (malar) rash, hair loss, mouth ulcers, discoid lesions
- Internal organ involvement: kidney, nervous system, lymph node swelling
Drug-induced subacute cutaneous LE
Drug-induced SCLE cannot be distinguished from the idiopathic form as there are no significant differences in clinical, histological, immunological or laboratory features. However it should be suspected in an older person developing this for the first time. The incubation period has been reported to range from 2 weeks to over 3 years.
The skin rash is typical of SCLE with symmetric nonscarring annular or polycyclic (ring-shaped) or papulosquamous (raised scaly) lesions usually on sun-exposed areas. However in drug-induced SCLE the rash can be more widespread than in the idiopathic form, including involvement of the lower legs. The rash may be blistering, particularly at the edges of active lesions. Clinically relevant internal organ involvement as seen in SLE has been absent or minimal in reported cases.
|
|
|
Drug-induced chronic CLE
Drug-induced chronic cutaneous LE is the rarest of the three forms. It appears on average 8 months after starting the trigger medication. Males and females have been equally affected and the mean age of onset has been 59 years.
Lesions resembling discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) have been the most common presentation but LE tumidus has been reported. The lesions typically affect the face, upper trunk and arms.
Discoid LE |
Discoid LE |
Lupus tumidus |
How is drug-induced lupus erythematosus diagnosed?
It is important the diagnosis be considered. For example, the first onset of typical subacute cutaneous LE in an older person, especially if involving the legs, should raise the suspicion of drug-induced LE.
There are no standard diagnostic criteria for drug-induced LE at this time. Most patients would not fulfil the American Rheumatologic Association (ARA) criteria for diagnosing SLE.
Proposed criteria are:
- at least one clinical symptom of SLE and a positive ANA and/or other lupus serology
- time relationship to starting the drug
- resolution when the drug is ceased.
Investigations would usually be done including blood tests and skin biopsy.
| Drug-induced SLE |
|
| Drug-induced subacute cutaneous LE |
|
| Drug-induced chronic cutaneous LE |
|
The dermatopathology of a skin biopsy: histology and direct immunofluorescence are indistinguishable from idiopathic forms.
Treatment
The most important treatment is to stop the trigger drug as this leads to resolution of the symptoms and blood test abnormalities. However this can be difficult to identify if the patient is on many medications as the incubation period is so variable and can be very long. It may require carefully supervised ‘drug holidays’ of at least 3 months for each drug.
Unfortunately at this time there is no test to identify the drug apart from noting improvement when the drug is ceased and recurrence of symptoms within 1–2 days when rechallenged. Rechallenge however may not be recommended especially if internal organs have been affected.
Generally the symptoms improve within weeks of stopping the drug, although full recovery may take as long as one year. The blood tests usually return to normal more slowly.
Sun protection should be advised where there is a sunsensitive pattern to the rash.
Symptomatic relief may be required. This may include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) for arthritis, topical steroids for rashes and systemic medications including hydroxychloroquine or oral corticosteroids such as prednis(ol)one for internal organ involvement. In most cases, no specific treatment is required as the drug-induced LE has been mild and resolves with drug withdrawal.
In general drug-induced LE is milder than idiopathic LE, but life-threatening complications can occur (e.g. cardiac tamponade due to pericarditis) and it may be fatal if not recognised.
Related information
References:
- Antonov D, Kazandjieva J, Etugov D, Gospodinov D, Tsankov N. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus. Clinics in Dermatology 2004; 22: 157–166.
- Dalle Vedove C, Del Giglio M, Schena D, Girolomoni G. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol Res 2009; 301: 99–105.
- Lorentz K, Booken N, Goerdt S, Goebeler M. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus induced by terbinafine: Case report and review of literature. JDDG 2008; 6: 823–827.
- Marzano AV, Vezzoli P, Crosti C. Drug-induced lupus: An update on its dermatologic aspects. Lupus 2009; 18; 935-940.
- Sontheimer RD, Henderson CL, Grau RH. Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A paradigm for bedside-to-bench patient-oriented translational clinical investigation. Arch Dermatol Res 2009; 301:65–70.
- Vasoo S. Drug-induced lupus: An update. Lupus 2006; 15: 757–761.
On DermNet NZ:
Other websites:
- Lupus Erythematosus, Drug-Induced – eMedicine Dermatology ndash; Medscape Referencendash; Medscape Reference
Books about skin diseases:
See the DermNet NZ bookstore

