DermNet provides Google Translate, a free machine translation service. Note that this may not provide an exact translation in all languages
Author: Dr Peru Urigoitia-Ugalde, Onco-Dermatology Fellow; Prof Fernandez-Penas, Dermatologist, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia. DermNet NZ Editor in Chief: Adjunct A/Prof Amanda Oakley, Dermatologist, Hamilton, New Zealand. Copy edited by Gus Mitchell. January 2020.
The introduction of targeted cancer therapies and immunotherapy has revolutionised the management and prognosis of metastatic melanoma, significantly improving drug response rates and disease-free survival.
These drugs are associated with a range of adverse effects, and cutaneous toxicities are the most frequently observed.
Targeted therapies (BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors) are drugs to treat BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Activating mutations in the BRAF gene are present in 50–70% of melanomas. The most common mutation occurs at position 600, where valine (V) is substituted by glutamic acid (E) (V600E) .
Immunotherapy includes anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) antibodies. These drugs are used to treat metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and others.
Mutations in the BRAF gene lead to overactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which plays a key role as a regulator of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. Inhibition of the BRAF kinase and the mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) leads to inhibition of cellular proliferation.
The mechanism behind most of the cutaneous toxicities associated with BRAF inhibitors is thought to be a paradoxical activation of the mitogen activated kinase (MAPK) in cells without the BRAF mutation, which leads to cellular hyperproliferation .
CTLA4 and PD1 are immune-checkpoint receptors that down-regulate T-cell immune function and promote self-tolerance.
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) frequently occurs in patients treated with a BRAF inhibitor as single agent. The incidence decreases with the addition of a MEK inhibitor. The majority of the SCC develop during the first 3 months of therapy, in sun-damaged and non-sun-damaged locations. Most SCC are well-differentiated or are a keratoacanthoma type. Excision is the standard treatment with a high rate of cure. Oral acitretin can be used as a preventive agent, since it reduces epidermal proliferation and does not interfere with the action of the targeted therapy.
Verrucal keratosis presents as a hyperkeratotic papule resembling a viral wart or small keratoacanthoma. They are considered premalignant and therefore precursors to cutaneous SCC and should be monitored. Treatment options include cryotherapy or surgery. Acitretin can be used as a preventive therapy.
Transient acantholytic dermatosis (Grover disease) is a common cutaneous eruption associated with BRAF inhibitors. It presents on the trunk as rapid-onset, itchy papules with a crusted top. Treatment includes topical corticosteroids, keratolytic agents (such as urea and salicylic acid) and acitretin for long-term control.
Palmoplantar keratoderma presents as hyperkeratotic plaques or calluses over areas of pressure or friction (mainly on the feet). Blisters are uncommon. The keratoderma can be very painful and limit the patient’s daily activities. Treatment with keratolytic agents (such as urea or salicylic acid) and potent topical corticosteroids are indicated (eg, clobetasol propionate ointment). Patients should be educated to avoid friction and to wear wide, comfortable shoes.
Adverse effects of targeted therapy
Changes in melanocytic lesions have been reported in patients on BRAF inhibitors, including the development of new naevi and regression or hyperpigmentation of existing naevi. An increased frequency of new primary melanoma has also been reported. These new melanomas have been shown to be wild type for the BRAF mutation, suggesting that paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway may play a role .
Drug-induced pruritus is commonly reported in patients taking BRAF inhibitors. Pruritus can be secondary to drug-induced dry skin or transient acantholytic dermatosis. General measures such as the use of soap-free cleansers and emollients are recommended. Topical corticosteroids can be used if dermatitis arises.
Drug-induced photosensitivity is more commonly seen with vemurafenib than dabrafenib and is induced by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) A radiation. Sun protection, including the use of broad-spectrum high protection factor sunscreen, is recommended.
Adverse effects of targeted therapy
Acneiform drug eruptions are the most common cutaneous adverse events associated with MEK inhibitor monotherapy, appearing in a seborrhoeic distribution (face, scalp, upper chest and back). Papules and pustules are present, but comedones are absent, unlike acne vulgaris. Oral tetracyclines (doxycycline, minocycline) and isotretinoin are used to prevent and treat acneiform eruptions.
As melanoma started to develop resistance to single-agent BRAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors were introduced as a combination therapy (dabrafenib + trametinib, vemurafenib + cobimetinib). The addition of a MEK inhibitor to a BRAF inhibitor improves the blockade of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.
The combination increases response rates and shows an improved toxicity profile in comparison to monotherapy. There is a noticeable reduction in squamoproliferative lesions (cutaneous SCC, verrucal keratosis, acantholytic dermatosis, palmoplantar keratoderma), hair follicle changes, and acneiform eruptions [4,5].
The anti-CTLA4 antibody is ipilimumab.
Ipilimumab commonly causes a maculopapular exanthem or morbilliform drug eruption. It is usually mild to moderate in severity, appearing on the trunk and extremities. Mild cases can be managed without discontinuation or dose reduction of ipilimumab. Topical corticosteroids or topical calcineurin inhibitors can be used. In more severe cases, ipilimumab should be discontinued and oral prednisone may be indicated.
Vitiligo-like depigmentation has been reported with ipilimumab. Patients should be educated about sun protection. An association between the development of vitiligo and better disease prognosis has been reported in multiple studies .
Other cutaneous adverse effects of immunotherapy can include:
They are better tolerated than anti-CTLA4 antibodies. However, anti-PD1 antibodies show similar immune-related adverse reactions [4,6]. The types of reactions can include:
Adverse reactions to immunotherapy
The combination of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 antibodies shows superior efficacy compared to monotherapy, but it is also associated with an increase in adverse events . The most common is drug-induced pruritus. Others include morbilliform eruption and lichenoid drug eruption. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions such as acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) have been reported.
© 2020 DermNet New Zealand Trust.
DermNet NZ does not provide an online consultation service. If you have any concerns with your skin or its treatment, see a dermatologist for advice.